U.S. innovation ecosystem is envy of world. Here’s how it got started.

Economist who studies technological change looks at public-private research partnership amid rising questions on federal funding.
Octavio Hahn · 18 days ago · 3 minutes read


```html

The Vital Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Biomedical Innovation

A Legacy Forged in Wartime Urgency

The American biomedical innovation ecosystem, a powerhouse of discovery and advancement, has its roots in the crucible of World War II. Faced with the stark reality of technological inferiority and the devastating impact of disease on troops, the U.S. government embarked on an unprecedented collaboration with universities and private industry.

This partnership, orchestrated in 1940 under President Roosevelt, mobilized civilian scientists to develop critical military technologies. It marked the birth of a system that fueled countless breakthroughs during the war and laid the groundwork for decades of scientific leadership.

From Humble Beginnings to a Thriving Ecosystem

Prior to World War II, the biomedical landscape looked drastically different. Universities lacked research funding, the pharmaceutical industry was fragmented, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) was a mere fraction of its current size, primarily conducting in-house research.

The war exposed the inadequacy of this fragmented system. The urgent need for innovative solutions, from combating infectious diseases to developing new treatments for battlefield injuries, spurred organizational innovation. The Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) was established, along with federal R&D contracts, patent policies, and peer review processes – all innovations born from necessity.

“In nearly every war before World War II, infectious disease killed more soldiers than battlefield injuries. Suddenly, there was an urgent need for innovation with immediate practical payoff – but no real infrastructure for getting it done.” - Daniel P. Gross, Associate Professor of Business Administration, Duke University

Penicillin: A Wartime Triumph and Catalyst for Progress

The wartime effort yielded remarkable successes, perhaps most notably with penicillin. While discovered in the 1920s, mass production remained elusive until the war. The OSRD's focused efforts led to the development of scalable penicillin production, a breakthrough that revolutionized both military and civilian healthcare.

This success wasn't isolated. From disease prevention to wound treatment, wartime research dramatically reduced military casualties and ushered in a golden age of drug development, including the antibiotic revolution of the 1950s and 1960s.

The Enduring Legacy of Wartime Innovation

The wartime collaboration proved to have remarkably long legs. Beyond immediate breakthroughs, it established a foundation for future innovation. New research tools, therapies, drug development platforms, and scientific understanding emerged from the war effort, propelling biomedical research forward.

Crucially, the war also trained a new generation of scientists. Thousands of students and young researchers gained invaluable experience in wartime labs, becoming the scientific leaders of the postwar era.

Indirect Cost Reimbursement: A Key Incentive for Collaboration

A key element of the wartime research model was the reimbursement of indirect costs. This policy incentivized universities and private companies to participate, ensuring they wouldn’t suffer financial losses by diverting resources to national priorities.

While the specifics of indirect cost recovery have evolved, the underlying principle remains: ensuring a sustainable partnership between government, academia, and industry.

Protecting the Golden Goose: The Importance of Continued Investment

The American biomedical innovation system, the product of an 80-year public-private partnership, stands as a testament to the power of collaborative research. While there's always room for improvement, it's crucial to protect the core elements of this successful system.

As Daniel P. Gross cautions, "The U.S. innovation system, and especially the biomedical innovation system, is the envy of the world... To undo that would be a great loss for the U.S. and the world." Continued investment and thoughtful policy are essential to safeguarding this vital engine of progress.

```